Total Pageviews

Thursday, September 5, 2013

The Power of the Pine (Part 1)

Chemistry is the difference between a good team and a great one.  We all know this.  We have all seen, coached, or been a part of team that has it.  We have all seen, coached, or been a part of a team that is missing it.  It is a concept that’s extremely hard to explain, but something that as a spectator, you know when you see it, or as a player or coach you know when you feel it.  As coaches, we want to be able to cultivate it, but it is often times an unsolvable mystery.  How can a coach create chemistry?  Is it even possible?  If I had a definitive answer to that, I’d be competing with Rob Smith of Simeon for state championships.  Instead, I am settling for a close second, blogging about it.  While the secret to establishing it eludes me, there is no question in my mind where it is born.  Chemistry is a result of the clear establishment of roles, with each player understanding their role, and pursuing excellence within it.  


A team has two separate groups that must work together in order to achieve success:  the players in the rotation and those that aren’t.  Our two-part analysis will begin with the more important of the two groups in terms of overall team chemistry, those that aren’t.  They are the foundation and life that a true team is built upon.  While Joe Henricksen may not write about these type of guys in the his Hoops Report and The Schmidt Brothers will probably not rank the state's best benches on their site, that doesn't mean that this part of the team is unimportant.  In fact, they might be considered the carbon of basketball chemistry.  In other words, if what my chemistry teacher taught me is true, "The guys that aren't" are absolutely essential!


Like many coaches, I am a firm believer that there must be a consistent rotation in order to achieve success.   Eight to nine players is optimal.  Anything more disrupts the flow of the game.  It’s similar to those huge movie ensembles in romantic-comedies like Valentine’s Day and New Year’s Eve which fail miserably because there are too many stars.  We, the consumer, can’t get into a good viewing rhythm because there’s no clear definition of roles.  Which Jessica is supposed to be the hot one: is it Biel or Alba?  Who is supposed to be the funny guy:  Ashton Kutcher, Jamie Foxx, or George Lopez?  How about the TV Medical Drama Star who is looking to pull himself a Clooney and transition to movie star:  McSteamy or McDreamy?   All these questions leave us confused and disappointed. 

The same is true for a basketball team.  You can’t go too deep into your bench without sacrificing flow, rhythm, and chemistry.   Obviously there are exceptions to this rule.  An example would be a team who full-court presses the entire game.  They can get away with playing a ton of guys because they are not worried about rhythm and flow.  In fact, their entire style is predicated on disrupting those two things for their opponent.   Rarely, will you find a team who does not play an up-tempo, full-court brand of basketball, who can successfully manage a rotation of ten-plus guys.  Those teams are an exception and not the rule.  In other words, they have “Love Actuallyed” (now a verb) their way to success against all odds.
With this concept in mind, where does that leave players who aren’t in the rotation?  From my standpoint, they are instrumental in building team chemistry.  A great team has guys on the bench who understand their collective role on the team.   At the same time, they are able to find individual roles which allow them to personally contribute and take ownership in their team’s success.   If we use a school as an example, it would be a mistake to think that teachers and administrators are the sole stakeholders in a school’s success.   Without the school’s custodial staff, security guards, classroom aides, cafeteria workers, and secretaries, success would not be possible.  They are the backbone of a school, and while they never receive any glory, like great bench players do for players in the rotation, they make the jobs of teachers and administrators easier.  The key is getting them to understand their value to the school and for them to take pride in executing their role to the best of their ability.  Great bench guys follow the same protocol.
In order to examine the Power of the Pine, it is important to understand the collective and individual roles of the bench.  First, we will take a look at the 5 key factors that the bench is responsible for as a GROUP.  Then, in the next blog post we will dive deeper and examine the individual roles that must be filled in order to have the foundation for great team chemistry.
Collective Roles
1.       Energy Providers:  A couple years ago, I was watching Conant play at the Jack Tosh Holliday tournament at York High School.   During warm-ups, I turned to the guy next to me and said “Conant is going to get killed.”  They failed the eye test miserably.  They were outmatched in the Holy Trinity of Basketball:  size, skill, and athleticism.  Even though I knew Conant’s coach Tom McCormack was one of the best, there was simply no way that his team would be able to overcome their deficiencies against the team they were playing. 

Immediately, I was proven wrong, very wrong.  Conant’s bench was into the game from the opening tip.   They were going absolutely crazy on the sideline.  They were screaming and hollering at the top of their lungs when their teammates were on the defensive end.  Every time they got a stop it was as if they had won the state championship.  When the opposing coach called time-out, they sprinted on to the court to congratulate their buddies.  They broke every huddle with little kid-like enthusiasm.  When a player on their team made a nice pass, the bench acted as if he had just assisted humanity against complete annihilation.  The charge was the ultimate.  There are no words, analogies, or hyperbole that could describe their reaction to a player who sacrificed his body for his team.  The video below is the only thing that could possibly do their reaction justice.

Conant’s spirit was so over-the-top that at first that it seemed like a joke.   As the game wore on, it became clear that this was not a gimmick.  The players on their bench actually took pride in influencing the game from the sideline.  Not only did they create psychological warfare on their opponent, but they understood that the energy they brought, particularly on the defensive end, was transferred to their teammates on the floor.  The players on the floor fed off this energy and competed as hard as I have ever seen a team compete before.  This effort only served to motivate the bench guys further.  By the end of the first quarter, Conant was up by 15 and in complete control.  The game of energy one-upmanship continued throughout, ultimately resulting in the end of the bench getting a chance to play almost the entire fourth quarter.  Fittingly, the starters now had an opportunity to return the favor which they happily obliged.

The lesson learned this day was the importance the bench could have in an outcome of a game.  There is no doubt in my mind that had Conant not possessed this unbelievable level of chemistry, they’d have lost handily.  The guys who entered the game only when they were up 30 understood their role and executed it to perfection.  While they may not have scored a single basket or blocked any shots until the game was decided, they were its most valuable players.  THAT is The Power of the Pine.  

2.  Ultimate Competitors in Practice:  As a group, the guys who ride the pine need to treat practice like it is their Final Four.  It takes an incredible amount of drive, mental toughness, and competitive fire to do this day in and day out, knowing that playing time will be limited.  Few are capable of doing it, but those that do improve at an incredibly high rate.  More importantly, for the team, the Pine’s sacrifices make the players IN the rotation better because they are consistently being challenged.   If a team has players who buy into this concept and have the ability to push the rotational guys, you have the makings of a successful team with great chemistry.  As a coach, these bench guys need to CONSTANTLY be praised and recognized for their contributions.

The best team that I ever played on had unbelievable chemistry thanks in large part to the collective intensity of each practice.  Our coach had a short bench, usually only playing about 6 players, maybe seven in any given game.  We had the talent to deeper, but he believed in a short rotation.  Despite not receiving any playing time, our bench was unbelievable in practice.  They created an ultra-competitive environment that I had never seen before or since.  Scrimmages were more intense, physical, and competitive than games were.  During practice, we absolutely hated each other and skirmishes would frequently break out. Afterwards we were able to flip the switch, hang out together, and act like nothing happened, only to then repeat the cycle over again the following day. 

My best friend, the starting quarterback on the football team, used to grab, hold, push, and body me around the court as if I was his worst enemy.  Even though I was our team’s leading scorer, it was difficult for me to even get A shot off against him at practice, let alone score.  I absolutely hated when he guarded me and used to get angry about it on a daily basis.  All the bone bruises, internal bleeding, and damage to my self-esteem were all worth it though because when games arrived, I felt like Andy Dufresne after he escaped from Shawshank and arrived in Zihuatenejo.  While Andy was able to achieve his dream by ridding himself of the warden, the sisters, and the shackles of Shawshank, I felt like without my buddy guarding me, I was now free to play.  Game days became so much easier than going up against him and the other guys on our bench every day, and as a result, our team thrived.  THAT's the Power of the Pine. 
Me On Non-Practice Days


This type of environment is hard to manufacture, maybe even impossible.  Can someone coach bench players to buy in to being ultimate team players?  Or, is it more the luck of the draw where every once in a while you get a special group of competitive kids who understand the importance of pushing each other?  It’s probably more of the latter.  But, that does not mean the coach can’t select his team in a way that makes this situation more plausible.  At the high school level, the only way for this situation to occur is by making sure that your seniors are players who are either in the rotation or right on the cusp of it.  If not, there is little incentive for them to compete every day, beyond simply being a great teammate (Possible, but rare).  Your underclassmen bench players don’t necessarily have to be on the cusp because they still have another year to work with.  Their motivation is to compete as hard as they possibly can  to improve so that they can be a part of the rotation the following year.  Long story short, it is important for a coach to consider a players year in school when selecting their end of the bench guys. Unless a senior has demonstrated a strong desire to be a part of the team with no complaints, go with the underclassmen. 

3. Don’t Worry Be Happy Guys:  Complaining spreads like wildfire on a basketball team.  If your end of the bench players don’t have a realistic view of their role, it’s a problem.  They will start to complain and so will their parents.  While often times this comes from a positive place, as the player simply wants to contribute to team success, it leads to negative results.   When one player begins to express their dissatisfaction, another will be soon to follow.  Eventually you will have a mutiny on your hand, the team chemistry will collapse, and you’ll feel like Jon Voight at the end of Varsity Blues.  Just think, all this happened because one kid had a bad and misinformed idea. 

Atrocious
Comparing this to real life, at some point, a person decided that Manpris (I blame Rafael Nadal), skinny jeans, and those weird non-prescription glasses (I blame Dwayne Wade) were cool. This trend became fashionable.  Now we have the NBA busses filled with guys looking like the picture on the right.  To think, this all could have been avoided if a friend or girlfriend simply said “Dude, is that your Halloween costume or are you actually serious?” the first time they debuted their new look.  Instead, the friend told a white lie and the ManPri wearers’ bad and misinformed idea became contagious. 


Incredibly similar and totally comparable, if a coach does not weed out complainers early, a promising season could become a miserable one and the Manpri effect could develop and fester.  When selecting players to fill the last spots on a roster, it is important to select guys who will be content in that role.  A player  who is simply happy to be a part of a team is much more valuable than a kid who is more talented but a complainer.  If neither kid is likely to play unless your team is up or down thirty, what is the point of selecting the better player?  There is none.  It is better to err on the side of the better teammate.  The better teammate is the one who doesn't complain and understands their role.  THAT's the Power of the Pine.

4.  Reality Checkers:   We all complain at some point in our lives.  It is human nature.  We always want more, no matter how much or how little we have.  Donald Trump will complain when one of his investments drops by a percentage point even if that brings his net worth down to 1.1 Billion.  The Kardashians will complain when they aren’t on the cover of US Weekly for the fifth week in a row.  Even Lady Ga Ga probably complained after Miley Cyrus stole a little of her “creepiest woman in America” spotlight at the VMAs last Sunday. (Don’t worry Ga Ga, you will probably win a life-time achievement award in creepiness, let Hannah Montana have her day in the Sun). 

In order for human beings to be brought down to size, we often need someone or something to provide us with perspective.  This perspective will usually help bring us back to reality.  Think about what your parents said to you as a kid when you didn’t eat your meal or complained about being forced to eat too many vegetables.  Johnny, the starving kid in India would cherish a green bean.  Similarly as an adult, you may start to hate your job and constantly grumble to anyone that will listen.  But when a bunch of your coworkers get laid off, you suddenly become thankful that you even have a job.  Personal misfortune of others like cancer, divorce, and bankruptcy seem to have a way of making your little problems seem a little less serious.  Khloe Calls Kim Fat doesn’t seem worthy of a magazine cover anymore when Michael Douglas Battles Cancer is available. 

Similarly, bench players who work hard, don’t complain, and simply enjoy being a part of a team have a funny way of humbling those who are in the rotation.  How can your starting forward justify dogging it at practice when your 15th man plays his heart out every day?  He’d have to be a true piece of work if he did (Which sometimes is the case).   Would your point guard complain about the number of shots he gets during games when he realizes that the end of the bench only gets to shoot when they run scout team in practice?  He might, but the presence of a great group of bench players would certainly make him think twice before doing so.   Even little Timmy’s father would have a real hard time pressing send on an email with the subject line titled “Timmy’s  AAU Coach and I Think Timmy Should Start.  P.S. We could coach this team better #you’redumb” when there are players who have not played a second all season.  He’d at least have to take the principal and superintendent off the CC’d line.  Wouldn’t he?

It’s true; some players just can’t be brought back to reality solely by seeing the struggle of others.  Sometimes, only observing what their less gifted teammates go through on a daily basis does not register.  Instead, they need to be prompted by the coach to pay closer attention.  A coach with the luxury of a great bench can verbally point out how much he respects and admires the hard work that those guys put forth every day.  I will tell you what; John, Matt, and Michael, you guys have my ultimate respect.  You bring it every day, no questions asked.  No complaints.  You three are invaluable to our team.  I hope everyone here understands how important these guys are.  All of us could learn something from the three of them.  Let’s clap it up for them right now.  They deserve it.  If you truly have great “Reality Checkers” on your bench, this will at least buy you some time before the next fire needs to be put out.  THAT’s The Power of the Pine.

5. The Jerry Lawlyer All-Stars:  Anybody who watched WWF wrestling in the nineties and early 2000s knows who Jerry “the King” Lawlyer was.   In case you were not a wrestling fan (may God have mercy on your soul), Jerry Lawlyer was a former wrestler, turned color commentator, for the WWF’s television coverage.  Like most color guys in wrestling, the shtick was that he always sided with and supported the heel (the bad guy) no matter what, much to the television audience and play by play guy’s dismay.  The heel could do no wrong in his eyes.  A guy could literally whack his opponent across the head with a sledge hammer when the ref wasn’t looking, and proceed to spit on him while he was down, all while taunting his opponents’ wife and children.  The King’s Response?

The King:  What a crafty move by the veteran.  You got to admire his smarts, don’t you McMahon?

Vince McMahon:  That was the most despicable thing I have ever seen a human do.  Not only did he use a weapon in the ring, but he spit on him.  He’s a disgrace.  That’s what he is!    

The King:  You got it all wrong McMahon, he thought Mick Foley was thirsty so he was really just trying to hydrate him.  He actually should be given an award for that!

Vince McMahon:  Should he be given an award for flicking off Mick’s beloved wife and kids after he did it.

The King:  That’s a sign of respect in his culture.  Stop being so ignorant and educate yourself McMahon.

The bench guys need to be like Lawyler in a way.  The coach may be critical of a player, but the bench can’t be.  They need to constantly be building the guys in the rotation up instead of tearing them down.  When a player gets screamed at and taken out of the game for a bad pass, they need to be the one’s telling that player what a great idea it was.  They need to be the guys slapping the starters on the butt after an off night.  They need to find a positive in everything and be willing to be vocal about it.  Simple acts like these could be the difference between a player in the rotation keeping their confidence or completely losing it.  We coaches can be relentless at times.  What the player sees as negativity, we see as constructive criticism.  Bench players who follow the King’s lead can alleviate what is lost in translation by being supportive and encouraging.  These actions will go a long way in terms of overall chemistry and team success.   THAT's the Power of the Pine.

Every coach in America talks about how important the players at the end of bench are.  Sometimes it may sound like an overused cliché.  Hopefully, coaches realize that it is not a cliché and that it is their job to sell this concept to the entire team.  The players on the pine need to truly feel it and the rotation players need to be taught to appreciate the Pine’s role.  If this can be accomplished, great chemistry is possible.  Without it, the team will continually underachieve.  It THAT is not the Power of the Pine, I don't know what is.

Next Up:  Individual Roles of the Bench Defined.
1.        Team Clown
2.       The Mediator
3.       The Vocal Leader
4.       The Crowd Pleaser
5.       The Agitators
6.       The Horse Whisperer
7.       The On the Fence Guys














  




 

Saturday, August 17, 2013

A Brief Reprieve From the 5QIP: A Basketball Tradition Gone Awry


OK, I’m going to be the bad guy for a second, but hear me out.  You may not like what is said or agree with it, but at least you’ll understand where I am coming from.  It is not out of malice, ill-will, or poor sportsmanship but rather sincerity and respect.  While the IHSA’s ATTITUDE mascot may shake his head in disapproval or cover his eyes in fear, I think a majority of coaches and players would agree with me.   It’s time to put an end to a recent trend in high school basketball.  

I’m going to broach the subject as a question, but really it’s a statement.  Can we please do away with the obligatory post-introduction-player-opposing coach- handshake (Now known as the PIPOCH)?  Let me clarify for those who are from states that do not do this or who are simply unaware.  The PIPOCH occurs after a player is introduced by the PA announcer.  The player initially runs through the tunnel formed by his teammates who are usually in the midst of a rhythmic group clap (Except the kid who feels like he should be starting.  He usually has his hands to the side in silent protest).   The player then usually meets the team clown at the end of the tunnel for some sort of spin-move, double high-five, chest bump, point to the sky move (this varies based on the team clown's versatility).   After the hand-shake ritual, they make a v-cut to the referees who are standing in front of the scorer’s table and give each one a fist bump.  Brown-nosing over, the player then jogs over to the opposing coach and shake their hand and say something along the lines of “good luck coach.” 

My nephew's reaction while watching the PIPOCH.  Side Note:  This kid is going to be at least a 4 on the 5 QIP Scale 

To the untrained eye, this just looks like good old-fashioned sportsmanship.  To me, it’s simply PIPOCHracy.  Sportsmanship is helping a player up after a hard-foul in tightly contested game.  It’s playing the game hard, but not dirty.  Sportsmanship is putting your subs in when the game is out of hand.  It’s not running up the score when the outcome has been decided.  It’s genuinely shaking hands after the game, offering encouragement and a handshake-hug or two.  The PIPOCH was probably originally meant to be a sincere sign of respect, but it has lost that meaning.  It has become an obligation and a distraction. 


To clarify, I believe in sportsmanship.  I love the tradition in hockey, where after a hard fought
Real and Sincere Sportsmanship
series, both teams will line up and shake hands and express their mutual admiration for each other.   I’m a huge fan of the soccer jersey exchange after international play.   The PIPOCH can even be touching and appropriate if used sparingly, such as after an opposing coach has lost a loved one in their family or during an intense rivalry as a symbol of “letting cooler heads prevail.”  Those type of traditions are unique and genuine.  When something is done over and over again for no clear purpose, like the regular PIPOCH, it loses its meaning.  It devalues sincere acts of sportsmanship.  That’s a bad thing.

Let’s think about the PIPOCH in terms of real-life scenarios and how absurd it would sound.  Could you picture OJ Simpson fist-bumping Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden before their closing arguments and wishing them good luck?  How about Robert Downey Jr. wishing Charlie Sheen well before they both read for the lead in Iron Man?  Better yet, would George Bush Sr. and Saddamm Hussain have met for a beer and exchanged pleasantries before the start of the Gulf War?  No, absolutely not.  That’s just not the nature of people or our society.  OJ would have been doing the proverbial courtroom “Noonan” in his head throughout the entire closing argument.  Downey Jr. would have performed some sort of Voodoo ritual on a Sheen action figure prior to the audition.  And if George Bush Sr. could have, he would have kicked off the war with a Comedy Central Roast of Hussein as a means of boosting public morale.

Your’re probably thinking: woah relax buddy, it’s not that big a deal.  You are blowing this completely out of proportion.  I can’t argue with you there.   You’re probably right.  However, think about it from a player and coach’s perspective.  The player wants to be by his teammates so that they can join the team clown in giving the next teammate that is introduced a high five, followed by a quick “Dougie” into a Bash Brothers elbow tap.  The opposing coach wants nothing to do with it, because he is in the midst of giving his last-minute scouting report reminders to his team.  More often than not, he will designate an assistant coach to be the official “hand-shaker”, who doubles as an offensive lineman to block any player from trying to get near the head coach and distract the team.  If that doesn’t tell you what coaches think about the PIPOCH tradition, I don’t know what does! 

The PIPOCH has become such a staple that coaches feel obligated to instruct their player’s to do it.  Even if they are not instructed to do it, the players do it on their own out of habit.  If they don’t, the coach or the player looks like a bad sport or a jerk among  those who don’t understand the inner-workings of what is really happening.   I’d equate this predicament to a kid who is forced to ask his girlfriend to Prom by base-jumping off the third floor of the school during dismissal so everyone can hear him scream “Kristin, will you go to Prom with me!!!!!” instead of simply saying “Kristin, will you go to prom with me?” after watching the latest episode of Pretty Little Liars.  The over-the-top Prom ask (Or OTTPA) has become the norm.  Just like the PIPOCH, it has lost all its meaning.

In the end, it’s up to us coaches to put an end to this.  If you happen to be playing the Kenwood Broncos this year, know that I will have absolutely zero problem with you instructing your players not to shake my hand before the game.  In fact, I will take that as a sincere sign of respect.  By allowing me and our coaching staff to focus on the kids in our huddle, you are displaying the ultimate form of sportsmanship.  We can shake each other’s players’ hands after the game.  Anything else would be PIPOCHritical.  Who’s with me?

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

The Art of Passing

The breakdown of the New 5 QIP theory will begin with the passing skill because it is the most under appreciated aspect of  offensive basketball. Out of all skills that make up an impact player (Passing, Shooting, Defense, Rebounding, and Ball Handling), a player's passing ability is often the most misinterpreted by fans, players, high school coaches, and people who evaluate talent.  A big reason for this is the assist statistic.  Too often, people jump to the conclusion that "More Assists" implies "Better Passer".  I'd argue that assists do indeed have merit in terms assessing a player's passing ability, but not nearly as much as people might think.

A comparison can be made between assists in basketball and the Win-Loss record for a pitcher.  The Win-Loss record in baseball is an extremely misleading statistic because the talent level of the team as well as situations completely out the pitcher's control often dictate winning percentage.   You could have a guy with a 2.65 ERA who hovers around .500 all season, while a pitcher on the mid to late nineties Indians could win close to 20 games while posting a 4.55 (That's Right, I'm looking at you Charles Nagy) due to an offensive line-up consisting of Alomar, Lofton, Belle, Thome, Ramirez, Murray, and Sorrento.  Hell with that amount of fire-power and/or Performance-Enhancing Drugs in the line-up, even Coach Maley might have been able to get a couple of wins against a team like the '95 Cubs (Had to find a way to take a shot at them) throwing 75mph heaters complimented by a poor-man's Charlie Hough dancer.

The above analogy is a bit of a stretch, but you get the idea.  Assists are a statistic that are correlated with both the skill level of your teammates and the type of offense that your team runs,  both of which are out of the player's control.  If  Steve Nash had to run the pick and roll with four guys with absolutely zero ability or skills (Think Smalls from the Sandlot, pre-Benny's tutelage.  Now think of the kid that Smalls use to pick on prior to moving near the Sandlot.  THAT KID multiplied by four are Nash's teammates.), he probably wouldn't have an assist all game.  Does that mean Nash is a bad passer?  Of course not.  Passing ability involves so much more.  The new 5-QIP theory attempts to try to quantify the art of passing beyond the assist. 




SKILL (Value of 1)
Passing (Value of .2)

1.  Velocity, Angles, and Accuracy (Value of .04)

One of my biggest pet peeves as a player, fan, and coach comes from the following situation:

Little Timmy beats his man and drives to the rim.  Johnny's defender steps up to help in the middle of the lane.  Timmy, realizing the presence of Johnny's defender fires a 55 mph shovel pass, from 8 feet away while looking in the opposite direction.  The pass hits Johnny in the hands and goes out of bounds.  Timmy throws up his hands in disgust and shakes his head because his highlight reel assist was ruined.  Timmy's father gets on his feet and yells "Great Pass Timmy, C'mon Johnny you got to catch that," He then proceeds to roll his eyes in the direction of another one of his fellow parents who "Get's It."  

This situation, which I've seen hundreds of times, absolutely drives me crazy.  Little Timmy wasn't wronged by Johnny.  He threw a terrible pass.  It was thrown with way too much velocity leaving it nearly impossible to catch from that short a distance.   The angle of the pass was horrendous because it should have been a bounce pass instead of a shovel pass.  Doing so would have made it both easier to see and catch.  Sure it may have been accurate because it hit Johnny in the hands, but that ends up being a moot point considering how hard it was thrown.  The worst part about it was that Timmy thought it was a great pass which was then reaffirmed by his father and people in the crowd, all of whom, like Timmy, have no idea about the concept of velocity, angles, and accuracy.

I'm sure my thoughts on this subject are probably very similar to those that my wife has after she gives me certain chores to do.  The problem is not that I don't complete those chores.  I do.  Every dish has made it's way to the dishwasher.  The detergent was put in properly and the machine was set to the correct setting
"Spray Arm"?  Who would have thought
of "Normal".  The problem is that I either forgot to rinse the dishes before I loaded it or I tried to sneak that unusually large glass baking pan in, blocking the rotation of the spray arms (google search replaced my previous version of "thing that spins").  Ignorantly, just like little Timmy, I am blameless and think I did everything right.  "Katie, I don't know what to tell you I think there is something wrong with the dishwasher" is my equivalent to Timmy throwing his hands up in the air and blaming Johnny.  In reality, an expert would realize that both Timmy and I displayed terrible technique which was the true cause of the error.  My bad Katie.  Even if Timmy or his father don't get it, I do.

A great passer, unlike Timmy, knows the right pass to use at the right time.  They create proper angles with the dribble and the use of ball fakes.  They know when to pass the ball soft or when they need to put a little extra giddy up on it.  When they drive into the lane and kick to a shooter, the ball is exactly where it needs to be giving their teammate the best opportunity to score.  Great passers are able to change passing lanes by using their eyes as weapons of diversion as opposed to looking the other way AFTER the fact.  Most importantly as my dad once told me, a great passer understand that if their teammate does not catch the ball, then it is the passer's fault, not the receiver.

2.   Pass that Leads to the Assist (.04)

Sega's Tecmo Bowl Equivalent
Anyone who played NHL 94 on Sega Genesis as a kid understands the concept of the hockey assist.  "Wait, you're telling me that after Larmer passes to Chelios who then feeds Roenick who then goes 5-hole on Patrick Roy, that  both Larmer AND Chelios get credited with an assist?"  When I was first made aware of this concept, I was ecstatic because I now had a much easier chance of having Roenick lead the league in assists when I played a video game season with the Blackhawks.  Fast forward a couple of years when I  became serious about basketball, and this concept had new meaning.  The hockey assist was just as important to the game of basketball as it was to Roenick winning  the digital-world Hart Trophy.


Great passers are brilliant at making the pass that leads to the assist.  They never force a bad angle from the top of the key to a post player.  Instead, they understand how to quickly swing the ball to a teammate on the wing.  This simple action allows their teammate to make a great post entry from the proper angle, resulting in a an easy two.  A great passer is able to make the outlet pass that leads to a fast break. They also can make the pass that dissects the middle of the zone that ends in a high-low score.  A great passer might drive the gap on the top of a two-three zone and instead of forcing a pass to a Big ducking in, they kick to the other guard.  This simple pass causes the low-guy closest to the sideline in the zone to step up, leaving an easy reversal to the corner for a wide open three.  These situations are just a few of the many examples of the beauty of the pass that leads to the assist.  It is a shame that players who excel at this rarely get recognized. 

Value needs to be placed on the "Hockey Assist" to truly assess passing ability in basketball.  Average passers seek out the traditional assist at all costs, regardless of how many scoring opportunities it causes their team to miss out on.  As long as the average passer's state line improves, they're happy.  Great passers on the other hand make the right decision regardless of who gets credit.  They just want to win.  In a way, a great passer is like the kid who finds the wallet laying in the middle of the street and returns it to the owner without expecting any reward in return.  Average passers are like the kid who in the same situation, returns the wallet, but only after assessing the owners financial situation, credit history, and stock portfolio to determine whether they can afford to dole out handsome reward.  Although great passers would never think to ask for it, it is time that the basketball world adopted the "Hockey Assist"  to give credit where credit is due.  The 5-QIP Theory has adjusted.  So should basketball.

3.  Passing with Language (.04)

"Passing with Language" is an advanced-level skill.  This term describes a player who is able to throw passes that seem to speak to their teammates solely by the location in which they're thrown.  "Passing with Language" provides directions that virtually eliminate a step in the decision making process for the receiver.  Not only does a player need to be fundamentally-sound and accurate, but they also need to have a high basketball IQ to recognize situations when they can use this non-verbal measure to communicate with their teammates.  The best way to understand a player that can pass with language is to take a look at the following examples:

a.)  An offensive player is posted up above the block.  The defensive player is playing behind the offensive player but shading heavily to the top-side.  A bad passer would throw the ball right to middle of his teammates chest which would eliminate any positional advantage the post player obtained.  An average passer would throw it directly to his teammates hand target closest to the baseline, leaving it up to the post player to be able to feel where his defender was at and make the appropriate scoring move.  The player who "Passes with Language" would pass the ball a little bit past the post player's hand target on the baseline side which would speak to his teammate by saying "Dude, the guy behind you is favoring the middle.  You have decent position.  Go get this perfectly thrown ball, left front pivot, and score.  You're Welcome."  The post player in this situation doesn't have to think about the next step. The language of the pass has already done that for him.

b.)  An offensive player is overplayed at the wing, free-throw line extended.  He sets up his man beautifully and makes a great backdoor cut.  A bad passer either doesn't pass the ball at all or they it to where the offensive player vacated, resulting in a turnover.  An average passer sees the cut, throws the bounce pass with the right velocity, along the lane line allowing his teammate an opportunity to catch the ball a step before the help defender arrives.  This pass relies heavily on his teammate being able to react appropriately to the help without traveling or getting called for a charge.  A player who "Passes with Language" throws the bounce pass about a foot past the defenders back foot saying to his teammate "Dude, mad respect for the cut you just made.  However, this team we are playing is no joke and actually understands how to play help defense.  I know you are focused on catching this masterpiece of a ball and don't see what is in front of you.  Be aware that someone is coming and be ready to make a move to the rim or pull up for the jumper.  You're Welcome."  The cutter in this situation loses vision on what's in front of him, but the language of the pass is all the eyes he needs.

c.)  A defensive player comes up with a loose ball during the opposing's team half-court possession.  One of the wings does a nice job sprinting the sideline, getting two steps ahead of the closest defender, and looks back for the ball just like his coach has instructed him to do.   A bad passer either doesn't throw the ball or he passes it behind his teammate ultimately stopping the fast break.  An average passer sees the opportunity and leads the player up the sideline which allows a smart defender who takes a good angle to get himself back in the play.  Now, the offensive player is left with a one-on-one situation which hopefully he can convert.  The player that "Passes with Language" sees that his teammate has a couple steps on his defender, but instead of leading the offensive player up the side-line, he throws a lead pass about 12-15 feet inside the sideline.  In doing so, he is saying to his teammate "Dude, you are slow as hell and your one on one moves are suspect.  In order to catch this pass, you are going to have to change the direction that you are sprinting and start angling towards the rim.  As a result, the defender won't have an opportunity to track you down and all you'll have to do is lay the ball in.  You're Very Welcome."

4.  Passing Into and Out of the Post (.04)

As I mentioned before in "Where have all the Post Players Gone?", passing into the post has become a lost art.  The argument was made that because guard play has become so anemic in terms of perimeter passing into the post, true post players have subsequently disappeared.  There is little incentive to do the dirty work if they aren't going to get the ball on a regular basis  By the transitive property, because very few guys can play with their backs to the basket, big men who pass well out of the post are few and far between.

In order to be deemed worthy of a .04 on the 5QIP scale for Post Passing a guard needs to be able to......

            a.  Fake passes before they make them to avoid deflections and create angles
            b.  Use footwork and pivots to create windows for the entry
            c.  Throw the hook pass, when the defense is 3/4 on the top side
            d.  Use a dribble to the baseline to create better angles
            e.  Put the ball accurately to a hand target
            f.   Pass with Language when necessary
            g.  Move after the pass by either laker cutting, screening away, or relocating
            h.  Throw the ball in quickly on a reversal and post seal
            i.  Do anything else that I forgot to mention

In order to be deemed worthy of a .04 on the 5QIP scale, a Big passing out of the post needs to be able to...
          
         a.  Immediately turn over their inside shoulder on the catch to see the floor
         b.  Stay calm in the face of double teams and crowding of the post
         c.  Throw a drop pass appropriately to laker cutters
         d.  Look opposite and pass accurately for a 3 vs. Double Teams
         e.  Either make a move or get rid of the ball quickly
         f.  Pass with either hand
         g.  Recognize where double teams are coming from quickly
         h.  Same attempt at a joke as i in previous example

5.  Passing Patience

Often times, the difference between either throwing or completing a pass is patience.  How often do players miss cutters because they either don't look or only give a brief look?  How often is a cutter open late after a defender thinks their job is done?  How often does a turnover result because a player on a fast break gives the ball up too early to a non-ball handler instead of waiting until they are closer to the basket?  How often does a guard or post panic on either a double team or a blitzing of the ball screen?  How often does a player pre-maturely throw a wild out of control pass for fear of getting called for a ten second violation?  How often is Maley going to write often before he realizes that we get it?  (The correct answer is 8)

If you were all oftened out by that last paragraph, I'd probably be correct in saying that you lost your patience.  That's fine as a reader, but if you wish to be a good passer,  you have to have the ultimate patience.  Sometimes that one hundredth of a second is the difference between a scoring opportunity or simply running time off the clock.  The number one example of Passsing Patience was mastered by Larry Bird and Magic Johnson.  Rarely, do I ever see this nowadays as either a coach or a spectator.

Caption Not Necessary
Larry Bird has the ball on the perimeter after receiving a pass from Dennis Johnson.  Robert Parish is posting on the ball-side block.  Kevin McHale decides to dive to the weak-side block.  Kurt Rambis, who is guarding McHale, is playing great off the ball defense, ready to help Kareem on Parish if need be.  Bird, is staring down Parish acting like he is really trying enter it to the Chief.  In reality, he is waiting to see something out of the corner of his eye.  Not yet, Not yet, Not Yet. Rambis turns his head for a split second just to make sure that McChale is on the block and that his peripheral vision is not deceiving him.  NOW!!!!  Bird fires a line drive right past Rambis's head nearly knocking of his glasses.  "Basket by McHale, from Birrrrrrrrrrrd!"  Rambis doesn't even know what happened, but Bird does.  Patience Kurt. Patience.

The art of passing is of the utmost importance to the game of basketball.  It is truly refreshing to see someone who actually gets it because a great passer has the ability to completely alter the fortune of a team.  On the flip-side, a player who can't pass, is capable of destroying it.  For my money, you can have all your crossover dribbles, fade-aways, and 360 dunks.  I'll take the guy that "Passes with Language."  More often than not, the team with that guy will win.


                                            NEXT UP:  REBOUNDING











Monday, August 12, 2013

Lesson Learned: Impossible to be an Infallible BasketBlogger


An amazing thing occurred last week during my visit to the Vatican while vacationing in Italy with my wife.  During my climb to the top of Vatican City, I bumped into the Pope himself who happened to be running stairs in order to get in shape for his sixty and over Men’s League team (“The Point Gods”).   Unbeknownst to me, The Pope is an avid hooper and basketball fan extraordinaire.   It came as a huge shock to find out that His Holiness had even read my first couple blog posts and had some unique feedback on my 5 QIP Theory and how it could be improved.   The following is the word for word dialogue of our conversation: 
Moments Before Meeting With the Pope

Pope (While giving me a smooth handshake-hug):  Coach Maley, what’s up man?  Huge fan of the blog! 

Me:  Thanks your Holiness, I’m a huge fan of your work as well.

Pope:  Well that’s good to know because it didn’t look like it when I watched your game on HighSchool Cube last winter.  After a couple bad calls, both the 3rd commandment and the “Golden Rule” seemed to have fallen by the wayside (chuckling).

Me:  I’m sorry Your Holiness.  I lost control of my emotions.

Pope:  Don’t worry about it. I get frustrated too when the refs continually screw up the principle of verticality.  I mean, there are only so many times a coach can turn the other cheek.  Am I right?  (chuckling and elbowing me in the ribs)

Me:   Tell me about it.  Wow Father, I didn’t realize how knowledgeable you were about the game.

Pope:  Don’t let these red shoes fool you; I used to be able to jump out of the gym and I was the ultimate Junk-Yard Dog.   None of the College of Cardinals could stop me on the low block.

Me:   Really?  Where did you fall on the 5-QIP scale?

Pope:  Well that is what I wanted to talk to you about.  I have a couple of issues with your 5-QIP theory.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I loved the analysis and certainly appreciated the humor, but I feel like it needs to be broken down much further.  Each of your five categories:  Skill, Basketball IQ, Size, Athleticism, and the Junk-Yard Dog should have subcategories to them.  Simply using your rationale of a player “either has the quality or they don’t”, doesn’t allow for an accurate comparison of players who fall at the same level.

Me:  I’m not sure if I understand what you mean.

Pope:  Let me explain.  Let’s say you and I are both 3s on your 5-QIP scale.  With the “you either have the quality or you don’t” argument, there is no difference between you and I.  A four is a four, a three is a three, and a five is a five.   But, if you break each category down even further and assign numerical values to those breakdowns, you have a more accurate assessment.   You may end up being a 3.1, but since I can shoot off the dribble and have great lateral movement, I am now a 3.3 and thus a better player than you.    

Me:  Oh my God, I mean gosh.  That makes so much sense.  How could I have not thought of that before?    

Pope:  Don’t be too hard on yourself, only the big guy is infallible.  Do you know how many times I heard that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John had to revise their gospels?  (Chuckling again)

Me:  Thanks father.  I know the direction that I will take the blog post.  You will be the first to read it.

Pope:  No problem, happy to help.  Before you go, one quick question.

Me:  Anything your Holiness.

Pope:  Do you believe in playing the pack-line or do you like to get out and deny on the wings?

End Scene

This completely true story illustrates the flaw in the 5 QIP theory that I wrote about a couple weeks ago.  It simply isn’t specific enough and can certainly be improved upon.   For instance, just because you have height, does that mean you have the size quality?  What if you have toddler-size hands, a Kevin Willis wingspan, and weigh a buck-fifty soaking wet?  We’d all agree that player does not possess the size quality.  At the same time, the lack of those other attributes of size should not completely negate the player’s height either.   In the new 5 QIP theory, there are five subcategories of each quality, and if a player possesses only one of those five subcategories, they will get a value of .2.  If they possess all five of the sub-categories, then and only then should they be given a 1 for that quality.   Therefore, in our size example, the player will get a value of.2 for their height and not simply a zero as dictated by the previous version of the 5-QIP.

The same holds true for athleticism, basketball IQ, and skill.   They have all been broken down into five different subcategories and assigned .2 values for each sub-category.  Since skill is probably the most important and comprehensive quality of the 5 QIP, it is broken down even further into mini-categories.  For instance, the five sub-categories of skill are shooting, passing, ball handling, rebounding, and defense.   If we take the shooting sub-category of skill, it is broken down even further to finishing around the rim, spot up shooting, off the dribble, on the move, and the closely guarded shot.  Each of which has a value of .04.   A player may be lights out as a spot up shooter, but average at the other four.  By further breaking it down into these mini-categories, subtle differences can be accounted for and factored into the overall equation that makes the player.    

Maybe the shortest height to wing span ratio of all time
The Junk Yard Dog is the one quality that will not be broken down further because it is a trait that I truly believe a person either has or they don’t and there is usually no middle ground.    As was the case before with the Junk Yard Dog, a player can have either the super-duper quality (Rodman) which acts as extra credit or the pooper-scooper quality (Vince Carter) which is a minus.  Similarly, those distinctions will apply to each sub and mini category as well.      

Below is a chart that I created which lays out the complete new and improved 5-QIP theory.  As a coach, the whole-part-whole method has proven effective, so I will stick with it as a blogger.  In future posts, I will breakdown and analyze each subcategory and explain its importance to the complete player.  At the conclusion of all the breakdowns, we will then come back to the chart below and decide what it all means and how it can be used to evaluate players.  If you don’t like or agree with the new format, take it up with the Vatican because once the 5 QIP becomes Papal Law, there is no changing it.   
  
5 QIP Qualities
Value
Athleticism
Speed
0.2
Jumping
0.2
Lateral Movement
0.2
Burst
0.2
Change of Direction
0.2
Size
Height
0.2
Weight
0.2
Wing Span
0.2
Hand Size
0.2
Potential for Growth or Optimal Size
0.2
Basketball IQ
Reading Screens
0.2
Footwork
0.2
Understand the Offense/Defense
0.2
Thinking the Game 2 Steps Ahead
0.2
Tempo Control
0.2
   Skills
Shooting
                Finishing Around the Rim
0.04
                Spot Up
0.04
                On the Move
0.04
                Off the Dribble
0.04
                Closely Guarded Shot
0.04
Ball Handling
                Taking Care of Ball
0.04
                Changing Speeds
0.04
                Getting Buy Defender
0.04
                Splitting Defenders
0.04
                Avoiding Wasted Dribbles
0.04
Defense
               Deflections
0.04
               Contests
0.04
               Off Ball Positioning
0.04
               On Ball Defense
0.04
               Forcing TOS/Blocks
0.04
Passing
               Pass w/ Language
0.04
              Pass that Leads to Assist
0.04
              Velocity, Angles, Accuracy
0.04
              Post Feeds/Passing Out of Post
0.04
               Passing Patience
0.04
Rebounding
               Offensive
0.04
               Defensive
0.04
               Box-Outs
0.04
               Tips
0.04
               Put-Backs
0.04
Junk Yard Dog
1
Maximum Obtainable Value
5




First Breakdown Coming Soon:  The Art of Passing